Tsakires v. Mesevich

New York Court of Appeals

Tsakires v. Mesevich

46 N.E.2d 908, 289 N.Y. 507, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1152

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 21, 1943

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 46 N.E.2d 908 (Tsakires v. Mesevich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tsakires v. Mesevich, 46 N.E.2d 908, 289 N.Y. 507, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1152 (N.Y. 1943).

Pincite

Opinions

Rippey, J.

The controlling facts in this case do not substantially or materially differ from those in the case of Angelos et al., against the same defendants in which a decision is being handed down herewith. (Angelos v. Mesevich, 289 N. Y. 498.) The unlawful conduct of defendants here found to exist is similarly subject to judicial restraint.

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rippey, J.

The controlling facts in this case do not substantially or materially differ from those in the case of Angelos et al., against the same defendants in which a decision is being handed down herewith. (Angelos v. Mesevich, 289 N. Y. 498.) The unlawful conduct of defendants here found to exist is similarly subject to judicial restraint.

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 N.E.2d 908, 289 N.Y. 507, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tsakires-v-mesevich-ny-1943.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack