Tsai Chi-Yi v. Hung Shrimp Farm, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Tsai Chi-Yi v. Hung Shrimp Farm, Inc.

DecidedApril 19, 2001

Docket13-00-00589-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Tsai Chi-Yi v. Hung Shrimp Farm, Inc. (Tsai Chi-Yi v. Hung Shrimp Farm, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tsai Chi-Yi v. Hung Shrimp Farm, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-00-589-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

___________________________________________________________________

TSAI CHI-YI

, Appellant,

v.

HUNG SHRIMP FARM, ET AL.

, Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 138th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yanez

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, TSAI CHI-YI, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 138th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 97-04-1459-B. Judgment in this cause was signed on May 11, 2000. A timely motion for new trial was filed on June 9, 2000. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant's notice of appeal was due on September 8, 2000, but was not filed until September 27, 2000.

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court's letter, the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant's response was received on October 6, 2000. Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeal, appellant's response to this Court's notice, and appellees' motion to dismiss is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellees' motion to dismiss the appeal is dismissed. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 19^th day of April, 2001.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-00-589-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

___________________________________________________________________

TSAI CHI-YI

, Appellant,

v.

HUNG SHRIMP FARM, ET AL.

, Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 138th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yanez

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, TSAI CHI-YI, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 138th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 97-04-1459-B. Judgment in this cause was signed on May 11, 2000. A timely motion for new trial was filed on June 9, 2000. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant's notice of appeal was due on September 8, 2000, but was not filed until September 27, 2000.

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court's letter, the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant's response was received on October 6, 2000. Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeal, appellant's response to this Court's notice, and appellees' motion to dismiss is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellees' motion to dismiss the appeal is dismissed. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 19^th day of April, 2001.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Tsai Chi-Yi v. Hung Shrimp Farm, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tsai-chi-yi-v-hung-shrimp-farm-inc-texapp-2001.