Tsabbar v. Auld
This text of 276 A.D.2d 442 (Tsabbar v. Auld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J.), entered October 13, 1999, which denied plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment declaring (1) that the contracts entered by plaintiff dentist with other health care professionals are license agreements, and (2) that the proprietary lease does not require review and/or approval by defendant cooperative’s Board of Directors of such agreement, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Because plaintiffs agreements with other health care professionals granted an “exclusive right to use and occupy” part of plaintiffs apartment at certain times, they were not mere licenses, but subleases for which approval was required under plaintiffs proprietary lease with defendant cooperative corporation (see, Miller v City of New York, 15 NY2d 34). Concur— Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
276 A.D.2d 442, 714 N.Y.S.2d 489, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tsabbar-v-auld-nyappdiv-2000.