Trzaska v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Opinion
3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5 EDWARD SETH TRZASKA, Case No. 2:22-cv-00634-RFB-VCF
6 Petitioner, v. ORDER 7 STATE OF NEVADA, et al., 8 Respondents. 9 10 This habeas matter is before the Court on Petitioner Edward Seth Trzaska’s unopposed first 11 Motion to Extend Time (ECF No. 15). Good cause appearing, the Court grants Petitioner’s motion 12 to extend. Petitioner has until May 5, 2023, to file his amended petition. 13 Petitioner at all times remains responsible for calculating the running of the federal 14 limitation period and timely presenting claims. That is, by setting a deadline to amend the petition 15 and/or by granting any extension thereof, the Court makes no finding or representation that the 16 petition, any amendments thereto, and/or any claims contained therein are not subject to dismissal 17 as untimely. See Sossa v. Diaz, 729 F.3d 1225, 1235 (9th Cir. 2013). 18 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Extend Time (ECF No. 15) 19 is GRANTED. 20 DATED this 8th day of March 2023.
22 RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Trzaska v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada (Trzaska v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.