Trzaska v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided March 8, 2023·No. 2:22-cv-00634·Unknown

Opinion

EDWARD SETH TRZASKA, Case No. 2:22-cv-00634-RFB-VCF

Petitioner, v. ORDER STATE OF NEVADA, et al., Respondents. This habeas matter is before the Court on Petitioner Edward Seth Trzaska’s unopposed first Motion to Extend Time (ECF No. 15). Good cause appearing, the Court grants Petitioner’s motion to extend. Petitioner has until May 5, 2023, to file his amended petition. Petitioner at all times remains responsible for calculating the running of the federal limitation period and timely presenting claims. That is, by setting a deadline to amend the petition and/or by granting any extension thereof, the Court makes no finding or representation that the petition, any amendments thereto, and/or any claims contained therein are not subject to dismissal as untimely. See Sossa v. Diaz, 729 F.3d 1225, 1235 (9th Cir. 2013). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Extend Time (ECF No. 15) is GRANTED. DATED this 8th day of March 2023.

RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trzaska v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada, (D. Nev. 2023).

Trzaska v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada (Trzaska v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Armando Sossa v. Ralph M. Diaz
729 F.3d 1225 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)