Tryon v. Smith

151 A. 192, 111 Conn. 733, 1930 Conn. LEXIS 197
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided July 9, 1930·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal furnishes an illustration of the inability of this court, although upon the evidence a judgment for the plaintiffs could reasonably have been reached, to add a fact to a finding unless it is a material fact which was an admitted or undisputed fact, or strike out a finding of fact unless it is a material fact which was found without evidence. Practice Book, p. 309, § 11.

The evidence was conflicting. We cannot hold that the trial court has found or failed to find material facts in violation of § 11 of the Practice Book to which we have referred.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tryon v. Smith, 151 A. 192, 111 Conn. 733, 1930 Conn. LEXIS 197 (Colo. 1930).

151 A. 192 (Tryon v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cassella v. Allen
185 A.2d 293 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1962)
Cassella v. Allen
1 Conn. Cir. Ct. 345 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1962)