Truvek v. Fall River Trust Co.

6 Mass. App. Ct. 951
Massachusetts Appeals Court·Decided December 5, 1978·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The action was properly dismissed. The title to the cause of action set out in the complaint had vested in the plaintiffs’ trustee in bankruptcy under the provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 110(a)(6) (1976), with the result that the action could not be maintained by the plaintiffs. See 4A Collier, Bankruptcy par. 70.28[6] (14th ed. 1976); Gochenour v. Cleveland Terminals Bldg. Co., 118 F.2d 89, 93 (6th Cir. 1941); Constant v. Kulukundis, 125 F. Supp. 305, 306 (S.D.N.Y. 1954); Hermsmeyer v. A.L.D. Inc., 239 F.Supp. 740, 742-743 (D. Colo. 1964); Moore v. Slonim, 426 F. Supp. 524, 526-527 (D. Conn.), aff'd, 562 F.2d 38 (2d Cir. 1977).

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Truvek v. Fall River Trust Co., 6 Mass. App. Ct. 951 (Mass. Ct. App. 1978).

6 Mass. App. Ct. 951 (Truvek v. Fall River Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Victorian Stables, Inc. v. Ehrhard
30 Mass. L. Rptr. 409 (Massachusetts Superior Court, 2012)
Gibbons v. Tomasso
694 A.2d 753 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1997)
Cole v. Pulley
468 N.E.2d 652 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1984)