Trustees v. Tappen
1 Johns. Ch. 368
Opinion
Here is no suggestion of any tampering with the witness, and Í am bound to presume there is a mistake or misapprehension on one side or the other. The cases of Griells v. Gansell, and of Darling v. Staniford, (2 P. Wms. 646. Dickens, 358.,) show, that re-examinations have been allowed in such cases ; and, in the latter case, the court took the re-examination from the examiner into their own hands. Let the witness be re-examined before one of the examiners of the court.
Rule accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Trustees v. Tappen, 1 Johns. Ch. 368 (N.Y. 1815).
1 Johns. Ch. 368 (Trustees v. Tappen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eiseman v. Gallagher
24 Neb. 79 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1888)
Hall v. Livingston
3 Del. Ch. 348 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1869)
Gale v. Cutler
1 Pin. 253 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1842)