Trustees v. Tappen

New York Court of Chancery

Trustees v. Tappen

1 Johns. Ch. 368

CourtNew York Court of Chancery

DecidedJuly 1, 1815

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 1 Johns. Ch. 368 (Trustees v. Tappen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trustees v. Tappen, 1 Johns. Ch. 368 (N.Y. 1815).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chancellor.

Here is no suggestion of any tampering with the witness, and Í am bound to presume there is a mistake or misapprehension on one side or the other. The cases of Griells v. Gansell, and of Darling v. Staniford, (2 P. Wms. 646. Dickens, 358.,) show, that re-examinations have been allowed in such cases ; and, in the latter case, the court took the re-examination from the examiner into their own hands. Let the witness be re-examined before one of the examiners of the court.

Rule accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chancellor.

Here is no suggestion of any tampering with the witness, and Í am bound to presume there is a mistake or misapprehension on one side or the other. The cases of Griells v. Gansell, and of Darling v. Staniford, (2 P. Wms. 646. Dickens, 358.,) show, that re-examinations have been allowed in such cases ; and, in the latter case, the court took the re-examination from the examiner into their own hands. Let the witness be re-examined before one of the examiners of the court.

Rule accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Johns. Ch. 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trustees-v-tappen-nychanct-1815.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack