Trustees of the Plumbers Local Union No. 1 Additional Security Benefit Fund v. City of New York

73 A.D.3d 530, 900 N.Y.S.2d 312
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 13, 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 73 A.D.3d 530 (Trustees of the Plumbers Local Union No. 1 Additional Security Benefit Fund v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trustees of the Plumbers Local Union No. 1 Additional Security Benefit Fund v. City of New York, 73 A.D.3d 530, 900 N.Y.S.2d 312 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan A. Madden, J.), entered February 23, 2009, which denied defendant City of New York’s motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The sole cause of action in the complaint alleges that defendant is contractually liable for interest and liquidated damages for failing to make timely contributions to plaintiffs’ trust fund. The agreement between the City and the nonparty union provided that the trust fund, to which the City was required to make pro rata contributions for its covered employees, was to be managed by plaintiffs under the terms of a trust agreement. Plaintiffs allege that the trust agreement, which preexisted the agreement between the City and the union, gave plaintiffs authority to enforce payment of timely contributions and to assess liquidated damages for delayed payments against employers like the City. In the context of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action, the court must afford the pleadings a liberal construction, take the allegations of the complaint as true and provide a plaintiff the benefit of every [531]*531possible inference (see Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326 [2002]). Applying this standard, it cannot be said as a matter of law that the union-City agreement is inconsistent with and does not incorporate by reference the terms of the trust agreement requiring timely contributions and assessing liquidated damages for delayed payments against employers like the defendant. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Sweeny, Renwick, AbdusSalaam and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2009 NY Slip Op 30378(11).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New York Independent Contractors Alliance v. Liu
43 Misc. 3d 443 (New York Supreme Court, 2013)
Allison v. New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission
35 Misc. 3d 500 (New York Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 A.D.3d 530, 900 N.Y.S.2d 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trustees-of-the-plumbers-local-union-no-1-additional-security-benefit-fund-nyappdiv-2010.