Trustees of Guilford College v. Guilford County

13 S.E.2d 622, 219 N.C. 347, 1941 N.C. LEXIS 321
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 26, 1941·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

It follows from what is said in Rockingham County v. Elon College, ante, 342, that two of plaintiff’s properties are subject to tax, i.e., the two that are not used in connection with the college, but are held on lease or rented out for profit or gain. These are designated as Lot No. 100 Magnolia Street and Lot No. 918 West Lee Street.

The facts are insufficient to determine with definiteness the taxable status of the house and lot on Friendly Road, the Dolly Madison Birthplace. See Revenue Act of 1939, ch. 310, sec. 600 (4), Public Laws 1939; Harrison v. Guilford County, 218 N. C., 718. Hence, in respect of this piece of property, the cause will be remanded for further proceedings as to justice appertains and the rights of the parties may require. Such procedure finds support in the recent case of Weinstein v. Raleigh, 218 N. C., 549.

Error and remanded.

Seawell, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trustees of Guilford College v. Guilford County, 13 S.E.2d 622, 219 N.C. 347, 1941 N.C. LEXIS 321 (N.C. 1941).

13 S.E.2d 622 (Trustees of Guilford College v. Guilford County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re the Appeal of North Carolina Forestry Foundation, Inc.
250 S.E.2d 236 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1979)
City of Reidsville v. Citizens Development Corp.
120 S.E.2d 730 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1961)
Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, Inc. v. Wake County
103 S.E.2d 472 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1958)
Stokes v. Smith
100 S.E.2d 85 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)