Trustees of Freeholders v. De Angelis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Trustees of Freeholders v. De Angelis

4 A.D.2d 752, 164 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4866

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 1, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 4 A.D.2d 752 (Trustees of Freeholders v. De Angelis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trustees of Freeholders v. De Angelis, 4 A.D.2d 752, 164 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4866 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Summary proceeding brought in the County Court, Suffolk County, to recover possession of real property. The tenant remains in possession after the expiration of the lease term and after service of a notice to quit. The tenant’s amended answer admits the existence of the relationship of landlord and tenant, and all other allegations of the landlord’s petition except the allegation that the landlord is the owner of the fee. The appeal is from (1) a final order awarding possession to the landlord, and (2) an order granting the landlord’s motion therefor. Orders unanimously affirmed, without costs. Inasmuch as no material issue of fact was raised by the precept, petition, and answer, the granting of the final order was authorized and proper. (Civ. Prae. Act. § 1430; cf. Gardella v. Bagopian, 263 App. Div. 816; Miressi v. Funicello, 277 App. Div. 931; Boss v. United Stores Realty Corp., 148 Mise. 912; Seltzer v. Block, 133 Mise. 842.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Summary proceeding brought in the County Court, Suffolk County, to recover possession of real property. The tenant remains in possession after the expiration of the lease term and after service of a notice to quit. The tenant’s amended answer admits the existence of the relationship of landlord and tenant, and all other allegations of the landlord’s petition except the allegation that the landlord is the owner of the fee. The appeal is from (1) a final order awarding possession to the landlord, and (2) an order granting the landlord’s motion therefor. Orders unanimously affirmed, without costs. Inasmuch as no material issue of fact was raised by the precept, petition, and answer, the granting of the final order was authorized and proper. (Civ. Prae. Act. § 1430; cf. Gardella v. Bagopian, 263 App. Div. 816; Miressi v. Funicello, 277 App. Div. 931; Boss v. United Stores Realty Corp., 148 Mise. 912; Seltzer v. Block, 133 Mise. 842.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 A.D.2d 752, 164 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trustees-of-freeholders-v-de-angelis-nyappdiv-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack