Trustees of Freeholders & Commonalty of East Hampton v. R. E. Dowling Realty Corp.

282 A.D. 966, 125 N.Y.S.2d 780
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 30, 1953
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 282 A.D. 966 (Trustees of Freeholders & Commonalty of East Hampton v. R. E. Dowling Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trustees of Freeholders & Commonalty of East Hampton v. R. E. Dowling Realty Corp., 282 A.D. 966, 125 N.Y.S.2d 780 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Opinion

-In an action in ejectment involving title to land in the Eastern Plains in the town of East Hampton, Suffolk County, both sides moved for a directed verdict at the end of the case. The court discharged the jury and took the case under advisement, and thereafter granted plaintiff’s motion and denied defendants’ motion. Defendants appeal from the judgment entered thereon. Judgment reversed on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. The find[967]*967ings of fact contained in the court’s memorandum decision are affirmed. Plaintiff claims the Dongan Charter of 1686 as its original source of title. That charter granted to the plaintiff “ all * * s"' parcell or pareells tract or tracts of land * * 6 [in the town of Bast Hampton] not yet taken up or appropriated to any particular person or persons”. There is no proof in the record whereby it can be determined whether the land from which plaintiff seeks to eject defendants, situated between defendants’ land and the mean high water mark of the Atlantic Ocean, was or was not “ taken up or appropriated ” at the time the Dongan Charter was granted; nor can it be determined where any of the lands in the Eastern Plains then “ taken up or appropriated ” were actually situated. The plaintiff, therefore, has failed to sustain the burden of proving its title. (Jarvis v. Lynch, 157 N. Y. 445; Beers v. Hotchkiss, 256 N. Y. 41.) Present — -Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strough v. Incorporated Vil. of W. Hampton Dunes
2018 NY Slip Op 8525 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
282 A.D. 966, 125 N.Y.S.2d 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trustees-of-freeholders-commonalty-of-east-hampton-v-r-e-dowling-nyappdiv-1953.