Trust Co. v. . Levin

140 S.E. 926, 194 N.C. 807, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 244
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 16, 1927·Published

Opinion

Civil action to recover balance alleged to be due on promissory note.

Defendants claimed a set-off to the amount of moneys had on deposit in the Bank of Hamlet at the time of its closing.

Upon the facts found by the judge, by consent, sitting as both judge and jury, a trial by the latter being waived, judgment was entered for the defendants for the excess of the amount on deposit over the balance due on the note in suit. Plaintiffs appeal, assigning error. The case is controlled by what was said in Coburn v. Carstarphen, ante, 368, 139 S.E. 596; Williams v. Coleman, 190 N.C. 368, 129 S.E. 818, and Davis v. Mfg. Co., 114 N.C. 321, 19 S.E. 371. The judgment must be upheld on authority of these cases.

Affirmed. *Page 808

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trust Co. v. . Levin, 140 S.E. 926, 194 N.C. 807, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 244 (N.C. 1927).

140 S.E. 926 (Trust Co. v. . Levin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. Industrial Manufacturing Co.
19 S.E. 371 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1894)
Williams v. . Coleman
129 S.E. 818 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1925)
Coburn v. . Carstarphen
139 S.E. 596 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)