Trust Co. v. . Levin
This text of 140 S.E. 926 (Trust Co. v. . Levin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Civil action to recover balance alleged to be due on promissory note.
Defendants claimed a set-off to the amount of moneys had on deposit in the Bank of Hamlet at the time of its closing.
Upon the facts found by the judge, by consent, sitting as both judge and jury, a trial by the latter being waived, judgment was entered for the defendants for the excess of the amount on deposit over the balance due on the note in suit. Plaintiffs appeal, assigning error.
The case is controlled by what was said in Coburn v. Carstarphen, ante, 368,
Affirmed. *Page 808
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 S.E. 926, 194 N.C. 807, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trust-co-v-levin-nc-1927.