Trussel v. Trussel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Trussel v. Trussel

27 A.D.2d 854, 280 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4608

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 20, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.2d 854 (Trussel v. Trussel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trussel v. Trussel, 27 A.D.2d 854, 280 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4608 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 28, 1966, modified, on the law and the facts, by striking out of its second decretal paragraph the direction for dismissal of the third cause of action and by adding a decretal paragraph directing that defendant account to plaintiff for all securities purchased in the joint names of the parties and for the profits and dividends thereon. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. The action is remitted to the court below for further proceedings consistent herewith. The record shows that defendant was active in purchasing securities, paid for to the extent of $21,000 by plaintiff, which were jointly owned. His purchases and profits and dividends therefrom should be accounted for by him. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 28, 1966, modified, on the law and the facts, by striking out of its second decretal paragraph the direction for dismissal of the third cause of action and by adding a decretal paragraph directing that defendant account to plaintiff for all securities purchased in the joint names of the parties and for the profits and dividends thereon. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. The action is remitted to the court below for further proceedings consistent herewith. The record shows that defendant was active in purchasing securities, paid for to the extent of $21,000 by plaintiff, which were jointly owned. His purchases and profits and dividends therefrom should be accounted for by him. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 854, 280 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trussel-v-trussel-nyappdiv-1967.