Truong v. All Pro Air Delivery, Inc.

278 A.D.2d 45, 717 N.Y.S.2d 526, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12693
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 7, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 278 A.D.2d 45 (Truong v. All Pro Air Delivery, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Truong v. All Pro Air Delivery, Inc., 278 A.D.2d 45, 717 N.Y.S.2d 526, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12693 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered on or about March 15, 2000, which, to the extent appealed from, denied that branch of defendants’ motion seeking dismissal of the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3215 (c), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Although plaintiff failed to move for entry of a default judgment within the one year, dismissal of the complaint pursuant to CPLR 2315 (c) was properly denied upon plaintiffs showing of a reasonable excuse for his delay and a meritorious cause of action (see, LaValle v Astoria Constr. & Paving Corp., 266 AD2d 28). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Andrias, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kanner v. Westchester Med. Group, P.L.L.C.
New York Supreme Court, 2023
Sports Legends, Inc. v. Carberry
38 A.D.3d 470 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Gavalas v. Podelson
297 A.D.2d 535 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 A.D.2d 45, 717 N.Y.S.2d 526, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/truong-v-all-pro-air-delivery-inc-nyappdiv-2000.