Trunnels v. Schmidt

50 F. App'x 886

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: November 15, 2002
• Docket: No. 01-35783; BAP No. MT-00-01349-BrPMo
• Status: Published

Opinion

ORDER

*

The judgment of the bankruptcy appellate panel is AFFIRMED for the reasons set forth in the memorandum disposition of the bankruptcy appellate panel filed on July 9, 2001. Because the parties failed to submit excerpts of the adversary proceeding to the bankruptcy appellate panel, it was unable to determine whether the factual findings of the bankruptcy court were clearly erroneous. We have reviewed the entire transcript of the adversary proceeding, and we conclude that the bankruptcy court did not clearly err¹ in its factual findings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

This order is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1 . Peklar v. Ikerd (In re Peklar), 260 F.3d 1035, 1037 (9th Cir.2001).