Trundle v. Heise
24 F. Cas. 250, 2 D.C. 44, 2 Cranch 44
This text of 24 F. Cas. 250 (Trundle v. Heise) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Trundle v. Heise, 24 F. Cas. 250, 2 D.C. 44, 2 Cranch 44 (circtddc 1812).
Opinion
The marshal was amerced for not bringing in the defendant on the return of the capias ad respondendum. The defendant had been discharged under the insolvent act. The marshal moved to be discharged from the amercement upon the defendant’s entering his appearance in proper person without bail; granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
24 F. Cas. 250, 2 D.C. 44, 2 Cranch 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trundle-v-heise-circtddc-1812.