Trump Village Sec. 3, Inc. v. Rothstein

66 Misc. 2d 221, 319 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1971 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1915
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided January 20, 1971·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In our opinion, the action of the tenants in harboring dogs in the demised premises was a breach of their respective occupancy agreements and justified termination of their tenancies (Hilltop Vil. Coop. No. 4 v. Goldstein, 43 Misc 2d 657, affd. 23 A D 2d 722).

The final judgments should be unanimousl/ reversed, without costs, and final judgments directed for landlord as prayed for in

[222] the petitions. If tenants remove the dogs within 30 days after service of a copy of the order hereon, eviction is stayed until further order of this court.

Present — Groat, P. J., Schwartzwald and Hargett, JJ.

Final judgments reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trump Village Sec. 3, Inc. v. Rothstein, 66 Misc. 2d 221, 319 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1971 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

66 Misc. 2d 221 (Trump Village Sec. 3, Inc. v. Rothstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hilltop Village Cooperative No. 4 Inc. v. Goldstein
43 Misc. 2d 657 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)