Trump v. Tishelman

80 A.D.2d 858, 436 N.Y.S.2d 759, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10696
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 9, 1981·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the New York City Commissioner of Finance to reduce the assessed value of certain property owned by the petitioner, the appeal is from a judgment of the. Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 18, 1980, which granted the petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The commissioner concedes that on March 3, 1980, he mailed a notice to the petitioner which advised that the assessed valuation of certain property owned by the latter would be increased effective the date of the notice. The commissioner’s failure to give petitioner 10 days prior written notice of the increase in valuation as required by section 1512 of the New York City Charter rendered that increase void (see Matter of Grand Cent. Bldg. v Tishelman, 78 AD2d 509, mot for lv to app den 52 NY2d 705). The language of section 1512 is unambiguous and must be given effect. Hopkins, J.P., Damiani, Lazer and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trump v. Tishelman, 80 A.D.2d 858, 436 N.Y.S.2d 759, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10696 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

80 A.D.2d 858 (Trump v. Tishelman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Religious Education Ass'n v. City of New York
123 Misc. 2d 786 (New York Supreme Court, 1983)
Lincoln Plaza Associates South v. Commissioner of Finance
116 Misc. 2d 357 (New York Supreme Court, 1982)