Trump v. Montgomery County Sheriff

Fourth Circuit

Trump v. Montgomery County Sheriff

393 F. App'x 981

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 2, 2010·No. No. 10-6524·Published

Opinion

[982]*982Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Earl Boyd Trump appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Trump v. Montgomery Cnty. Sheriff, No. 7:10-cv-00142-GEC-MFU, 2010 WL 1278596 (W.D.Va. Mar. 31, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[982]*982Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Earl Boyd Trump appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Trump v. Montgomery Cnty. Sheriff, No. 7:10-cv-00142-GEC-MFU, 2010 WL 1278596 (W.D.Va. Mar. 31, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Trump v. Montgomery County Sheriff, 393 F. App'x 981 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

393 F. App'x 981 (Trump v. Montgomery County Sheriff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related