Trump v. Karnoski

139 S. Ct. 950, 203 L. Ed. 2d 128
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 22, 2019·No. No. 18A625.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Application for stay presented to Justice KAGAN and by her referred to the Court granted, and the District Court's December 11, 2017 order granting a preliminary injunction is stayed pending disposition of the Government's appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and disposition of the Government's petition for a writ of certiorari, if such writ is sought. If a writ of certiorari is sought and the Court denies the petition, this order shall terminate automatically. If the Court grants the petition for a writ of certiorari, this order shall terminate when the Court enters its judgment.

Justice GINSBURG, Justice BREYER, Justice SOTOMAYOR, and Justice KAGAN would deny the application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trump v. Karnoski, 139 S. Ct. 950, 203 L. Ed. 2d 128 (U.S. 2019).

139 S. Ct. 950 (Trump v. Karnoski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ryan Karnoski v. Donald Trump
926 F.3d 1180 (Ninth Circuit, 2019)