Trump v. HENRY CHENG

918 N.E.2d 958, 13 N.Y.3d 833, 890 N.Y.S.2d 443, 2009 NY Slip Op 87003, 2009 N.Y. LEXIS 4009
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 27, 2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the dismissal of all but the expressly severed 18th cause of action, denied; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the remainder of the Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that it does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trump v. HENRY CHENG, 918 N.E.2d 958, 13 N.Y.3d 833, 890 N.Y.S.2d 443, 2009 NY Slip Op 87003, 2009 N.Y. LEXIS 4009 (N.Y. 2009).

918 N.E.2d 958 (Trump v. HENRY CHENG) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Siskind v. Schael
918 N.E.2d 957 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)