Trumbley v. New York Cent. & H. R. Railroad

122 N.Y.S. 1071
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMay 18, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 122 N.Y.S. 1071 (Trumbley v. New York Cent. & H. R. Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trumbley v. New York Cent. & H. R. Railroad, 122 N.Y.S. 1071 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have heretofore granted the defendant leave to apply to the trial justice for a resettlement of the case, so as to have it appear by proper certificate that it contains all the evidence and proceedings-on the trial. It is not our province to suggest to the learned trial justice what evidence shall be inserted in the case, or omitted therefrom. That is solely his function. But we think he should settle the case in such a way that he can make such certificate, and that the parties are as a matter of right entitled thereto. Until such certificate is made, the case is not in readiness for reargument.

The motion for postponement of the argument is therefore granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frank v. Subin
123 N.Y.S. 890 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 N.Y.S. 1071, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trumbley-v-new-york-cent-h-r-railroad-nyappterm-1910.