Truman v. Board of Supervisors

110 Cal. 128
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 19, 1895
DocketS. F. No. 272
StatusPublished

This text of 110 Cal. 128 (Truman v. Board of Supervisors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Truman v. Board of Supervisors, 110 Cal. 128 (Cal. 1895).

Opinion

The Court.

Petition for writ of mandate. Assuming, but not deciding, that this court could control législative action of the board of supervisors, as prayed for in this proceeding, the writ must be denied, because under present statutory law the board of supervisors of the city and county of San Francisco have the power to fix the rate of taxation, and the mayor has no veto of their action in that matter. If other duties of the court permit, reasons for this conclusion will be more fully given in an opinion to be hereafter prepared.

The writ is denied and the proceeding dismissed.

McFarland, J., Garoutte, J.,

Harrison, J., Van Fleet, J.,

Henshaw, J., Beatty, C. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 Cal. 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/truman-v-board-of-supervisors-cal-1895.