Trulock v. Freeh

289 F.3d 829, 2002 WL 575630
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 17, 2002·No. 00-2260·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

ORDER

Appellants and appellees have filed petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc.

Judges Michael, Gregory, and Legg voted to deny panel rehearing.

A member of the Court requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc filed by the defendants. There was no request for a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc filed by the plaintiffs.

Judge Widener voted to grant the defendants’ petition for rehearing en banc and Chief Judge Wilkinson and Judges Wilkins, Niemeyer, Luttig, Williams, Michael, Motz, Traxler, King and Gregory voted against rehearing en banc.

The Court denies the petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc.

Entered at the direction of Judge Michael for the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trulock v. Freeh, 289 F.3d 829, 2002 WL 575630 (4th Cir. 2002).

289 F.3d 829 (Trulock v. Freeh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Trulock, III v. Freeh
289 F.3d 829 (Fourth Circuit, 2002)