Trull v. Wilson

9 Mass. 154
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided June 15, 1812·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

Since the decision in the last case, the only question to be determined in this action is, whether the defendants are chargeable, on their bond, on account of the time of the prisoner Wilson’s being in a private house.

By the statute of 1784, c. 41, § 9, prisoners having given bond, &c., are to have “ the liberty of the yard within the prison in the daytime.” The expression of daytime, here used, has always been construed to mean that portion of the twenty-four hours in which a man’s person and countenance are distinguishable. In this case, the daylight was not gone, and of consequence there was no escape,

Judgment on the verdi&t.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trull v. Wilson, 9 Mass. 154 (Mass. 1812).

9 Mass. 154 (Trull v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. State
306 A.2d 127 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1973)
People v. Watson
39 Misc. 2d 808 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1963)
Moore v. United States
57 F.2d 840 (Fifth Circuit, 1932)
United States v. Callahan
17 F.2d 937 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1927)
Hardin v. McCanse
53 Mo. 255 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1873)
Inhabitants of Manchester v. Inhabitants of Boston
16 Mass. 230 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1819)