Trull v. Wilson
This text of 9 Mass. 154 (Trull v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Since the decision in the last case, the only question to be determined in this action is, whether the defendants are chargeable, on their bond, on account of the time of the prisoner Wilson’s being in a private house.
By the statute of 1784, c. 41, § 9, prisoners having given bond, &c., are to have “ the liberty of the yard within the prison in the daytime.” The expression of daytime, here used, has always been construed to mean that portion of the twenty-four hours in which a man’s person and countenance are distinguishable. In this case, the daylight was not gone, and of consequence there was no escape,
Judgment on the verdi&t.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 Mass. 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trull-v-wilson-mass-1812.