Trull v. State

334 S.W.2d 180, 169 Tex. Crim. 357, 1960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2939
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 6, 1960
Docket31838
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 334 S.W.2d 180 (Trull v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trull v. State, 334 S.W.2d 180, 169 Tex. Crim. 357, 1960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2939 (Tex. 1960).

Opinion

WOODLEY, Judge.

The prosecution herein was upon complaint filed in corporation court. A jury trial in that court resulted in a conviction from which appeal was taken to the county court.

Judgment was rendered in the county court upon a jury verdict finding appellant guilty of speeding, and assessing his punishment at a fine of $100. From this judgment appellant gave notice of appeal to this court.

We are without jurisdiction to enter any order herein other than one dismissing the appeal.

Art. V, Section 5, of the Constitution of Texas provides that the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals shall have appellate jurisdiction co-extensive with the limits of the state in all criminal cases of whatever grade “with such exceptions and under such regulations as may be prescribed by law.”

Art. 53 V.A.C.C.P. provides:

“The Court of Criminal Appeals shall have appellate jurisdiction co-extensive with the limits of the State in all criminal cases. This article shall not be so construed as to embrace any case which has been appealed from any inferior court to the county court or county court at law, in which the fine imposed by the county court or county court at law shall not exceed one hundred dollars.”

The fine imposed by the county court does not exceed $100, and the case having originated in the corporation court, no appeal lies to this court. Zummo v. State, 146 Tex. Cr. R. 350, 175 S.W. 2d 89; Bass v. State, 153 Tex. Cr. R. 441, 221 S.W. *359 2d 299; Largent v. Texas, 63 S.Ct. 667, 318 U.S. 418, 87 L.Ed. 873.

The state’s motion to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bridges v. State
423 S.W.2d 931 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1968)
Ford v. State
384 S.W.2d 874 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1964)
Butler v. State
363 S.W.2d 469 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1963)
Hoover v. State
355 S.W.2d 527 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
334 S.W.2d 180, 169 Tex. Crim. 357, 1960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trull-v-state-texcrimapp-1960.