Trull v. Central Carolina Bank & Trust
490 S.E.2d 238, 347 N.C. 262, 1997 N.C. LEXIS 657
Opinion
The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in the majority opinion by Judge Eagles. We hold that plaintiffs petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue was improvidently allowed.
AFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Trull v. Central Carolina Bank & Trust, 490 S.E.2d 238, 347 N.C. 262, 1997 N.C. LEXIS 657 (N.C. 1997).
490 S.E.2d 238 (Trull v. Central Carolina Bank & Trust) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Colorado Bankers Life Insurance Company v. Academy Financial Assets, LLC
E.D. North Carolina, 2021
Monsanto Company v. ARE-108 Alexander Road, LLC
632 F. App'x 733 (Fourth Circuit, 2015)
TriMark Foodcraft, Inc. v. Leger
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014
Austin v. Bank of America, N.A.
743 S.E.2d 399 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2013)
Lunsford v. Renn
700 S.E.2d 94 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary
698 S.E.2d 404 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)