Trujillo v. Harsarb Inc

E.D. California

Trujillo v. Harsarb Inc

DecidedMay 17, 2021

Docket1:21-cv-00342

StatusUnknown

This text of Trujillo v. Harsarb Inc (Trujillo v. Harsarb Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trujillo v. Harsarb Inc, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 JOSE TRUJILLO, Case No. 1:21-cv-00342-NONE-SAB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER CONTINUING MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND 13 v. REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 14 HARSARB INC., et al., SIXTY DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendants.

16 17 Jose Trujillo (“Plaintiff”) filed this action on March 5, 2021, against Harsarb Inc. and 18 Harsarb Firm LLC (“Defendants”). On May 14, 2021, Plaintiff filed a request for entry of 19 default and the Clerk of the Court entered default against Defendants. (ECF Nos. 8, 9, 10.) 20 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 55, obtaining a default judgment is a two- 21 step process. Yue v. Storage Technology Corp., No. 3:07-cv-05850, 2008 WL 361142, *2 (N.D. 22 Cal. Feb. 11, 2008). Entry of default is appropriate as to any party against whom a judgment for 23 affirmative relief is sought that has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by the Federal 24 Rules of Civil Procedure and where that fact is made to appear by affidavit or otherwise. Fed. R. 25 Civ. P. 55(a). After entry of default, the plaintiff can seek entry of default judgment. Fed. R. 26 Civ. P. 55(b)(1) and (2). “Default judgments are generally disfavored, and whenever it is 27 reasonably possible, cases should be decided upon their merits.” In re Hammer, 940 F.2d 524, (9th Cir. 1991) (internal punctuation and citations omitted). 1 As all defendants in this matter are in default, the Court shall continue the mandatory 2 | scheduling conference and set a deadline for a motion for default judgment to be filed. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. Within sixty (60) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall file a 5 motion for default judgment 6 2. The scheduling conference set for June 10, 2021, is CONTINUED to September 7 30, 2021, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9; 8 3. The parties shall file a joint scheduling report seven (7) days prior to the 9 scheduling conference; and 10 4. Plaintiff is advised that the failure to comply with this order shall result in a 11 recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. 12 B IT IS SO ORDERED. DAM Le 14 | Dated: _ May 17, 2021

Is UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 JOSE TRUJILLO, Case No. 1:21-cv-00342-NONE-SAB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER CONTINUING MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND 13 v. REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 14 HARSARB INC., et al., SIXTY DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendants.

16 17 Jose Trujillo (“Plaintiff”) filed this action on March 5, 2021, against Harsarb Inc. and 18 Harsarb Firm LLC (“Defendants”). On May 14, 2021, Plaintiff filed a request for entry of 19 default and the Clerk of the Court entered default against Defendants. (ECF Nos. 8, 9, 10.) 20 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 55, obtaining a default judgment is a two- 21 step process. Yue v. Storage Technology Corp., No. 3:07-cv-05850, 2008 WL 361142, *2 (N.D. 22 Cal. Feb. 11, 2008). Entry of default is appropriate as to any party against whom a judgment for 23 affirmative relief is sought that has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by the Federal 24 Rules of Civil Procedure and where that fact is made to appear by affidavit or otherwise. Fed. R. 25 Civ. P. 55(a). After entry of default, the plaintiff can seek entry of default judgment. Fed. R. 26 Civ. P. 55(b)(1) and (2). “Default judgments are generally disfavored, and whenever it is 27 reasonably possible, cases should be decided upon their merits.” In re Hammer, 940 F.2d 524, (9th Cir. 1991) (internal punctuation and citations omitted). 1 As all defendants in this matter are in default, the Court shall continue the mandatory 2 | scheduling conference and set a deadline for a motion for default judgment to be filed. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. Within sixty (60) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall file a 5 motion for default judgment 6 2. The scheduling conference set for June 10, 2021, is CONTINUED to September 7 30, 2021, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9; 8 3. The parties shall file a joint scheduling report seven (7) days prior to the 9 scheduling conference; and 10 4. Plaintiff is advised that the failure to comply with this order shall result in a 11 recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. 12 B IT IS SO ORDERED. DAM Le 14 | Dated: _ May 17, 2021

Is UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Trujillo v. Harsarb Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trujillo-v-harsarb-inc-caed-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack