Trujillo v. Conrad

District Court, E.D. California·Decided April 2, 2021·No. 1:19-cv-01627·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOSE TRUJILLO, Case No. 1:19-cv-01627-SAB Plaintiff, 9] ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT ETHAN CONRAD, TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE Defendant. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (ECF No. 66) On April 1, 2021, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs and fees. In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or attorneys’ fees. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule □□ (a). IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. Dated: _April 2, 2021 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trujillo v. Conrad, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

Trujillo v. Conrad (Trujillo v. Conrad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)