Trujillo v. Conrad

District Court, E.D. California·Decided April 2, 2021·No. 1:19-cv-01627·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 | EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 | JOSE TRUJILLO, Case No. 1:19-cv-01627-SAB Plaintiff, 9] ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT ETHAN CONRAD, TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE 10 | Defendant. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) 11 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12 (ECF No. 66) 13 14 On April 1, 2021, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and with 15 | each party to bear its own costs and fees. In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has 16 | been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 17 | (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or 18 | attorneys’ fees. 19 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 20 | case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule □□ (a). 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 FA. 3 | Dated: _April 2, 2021 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trujillo v. Conrad, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

Trujillo v. Conrad (Trujillo v. Conrad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)