Truitt v. State
134 S.E. 204, 35 Ga. App. 564, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 981
Opinion
The evidence for the State (no evidence being presented by the
accused) made a positive case against the defendant, and the jury could not have done other than convict him. The special assignment of error that the court did not charge upon the law of confessions is wholly without merit. See, in this connection, Story v. State, 145 Ga. 43 (2) (88 S. E. 548). The court properly overruled the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Truitt v. State, 134 S.E. 204, 35 Ga. App. 564, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 981 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).
134 S.E. 204 (Truitt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Story v. State
88 S.E. 548 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)