Truitt v. State
This text of 134 S.E. 204 (Truitt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence for the State (no evidence being presented by the
accused) made a positive case against the defendant, and the jury could not have done other than convict him. The special assignment of error that the court did not charge upon the law of confessions is wholly without merit. See, in this connection, Story v. State, 145 Ga. 43 (2) (88 S. E. 548). The court properly overruled the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
134 S.E. 204, 35 Ga. App. 564, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/truitt-v-state-gactapp-1926.