Truitt v. State

134 S.E. 204, 35 Ga. App. 564, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 981
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 13, 1926
Docket17349
StatusPublished

This text of 134 S.E. 204 (Truitt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Truitt v. State, 134 S.E. 204, 35 Ga. App. 564, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 981 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Lube, J.

The evidence for the State (no evidence being presented by the

accused) made a positive case against the defendant, and the jury could not have done other than convict him. The special assignment of error that the court did not charge upon the law of confessions is wholly without merit. See, in this connection, Story v. State, 145 Ga. 43 (2) (88 S. E. 548). The court properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Story v. State
88 S.E. 548 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 S.E. 204, 35 Ga. App. 564, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/truitt-v-state-gactapp-1926.