Truitt v. American Savings Bank

166 S.E. 190, 175 Ga. 785, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 330
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 13, 1932·No. No. 8842·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Hnx, J.

Under the allegations of the petition, which áre taken as true on demurrer, the plaintiff has a lien on the property in controversy, superior to that of the defendant. He has an adequate remedy at law by [786]*786levy of Ills fi. fa. on the property, regardless of whether he levies before or after the defendant does. There was therefore no jurisdiction in a court of equity to enjoin the sale of the property under the power contained in the defendant’s deed; and the court did not err in dismissing the petition on demurrer.

No. 8842. October 13, 1932.

Judgment affirmed.

All 'the Justices concur, except Athvnson, J., absent. Jones, Fuller, Bussell & Clapp and Douglas M. Orr, for plaintiff. Clarice & Clarice, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Truitt v. American Savings Bank, 166 S.E. 190, 175 Ga. 785, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 330 (Ga. 1932).

166 S.E. 190 (Truitt v. American Savings Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gallagher v. Buckhead Community Bank
683 S.E.2d 50 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2009)