Truette v. State
This text of 914 So. 2d 1074 (Truette v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Justin TRUETTE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
M. Lilja Dandelake of Frank E. Sheffield, P.A., Tallahassee, Attorneys for Appellant.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Bryan Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Attorneys for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant alleges that the trial court failed to award him the proper amount of jail credit. The State concedes that Appellant is entitled to additional credit. Because Appellant served time in jail as a special condition of his probation, he is entitled to credit for that time upon his sentencing for violation of probation. Appellant is entitled to 180 days of jail credit on count two in case number 03-1443 and 60 days of jail credit on count one in case number 03-1729. Appellant's sentence is reversed and remanded with the above instructions.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
KAHN, C.J., and HAWKES and THOMAS, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
914 So. 2d 1074, 2005 WL 3179442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/truette-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.