Truesdail v. Sanderson

33 Mo. 532
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided March 15, 1863·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Bates, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The court below properly excluded Field’s testimony of statements made by Myerson. They were hearsay merely, and nothing is shown to justify their introduction. For anything that appears in the record, Myerson was himself a competent and available witness. It was proper to exclude testimony by another of his statements.

There was no evidence tending to prove some of the matters stated in the petition, which were necessary to constitute the cause of action set up therein. The judgment for the defendant was properly rendered, and is affirmed.

Judges Bay and Dryden concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Truesdail v. Sanderson, 33 Mo. 532 (Mo. 1863).

33 Mo. 532 (Truesdail v. Sanderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bank of Dearborn v. Gabbert
291 S.W. 142 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1926)
Whimster v. Holmes
164 S.W. 236 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1914)