Truesdail v. Sanderson

33 Mo. 532
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedMarch 15, 1863
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 33 Mo. 532 (Truesdail v. Sanderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Truesdail v. Sanderson, 33 Mo. 532 (Mo. 1863).

Opinion

Bates, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The court below properly excluded Field’s testimony of statements made by Myerson. They were hearsay merely, and nothing is shown to justify their introduction. For anything that appears in the record, Myerson was himself a competent and available witness. It was proper to exclude testimony by another of his statements.

There was no evidence tending to prove some of the matters stated in the petition, which were necessary to constitute the cause of action set up therein. The judgment for the defendant was properly rendered, and is affirmed.

Judges Bay and Dryden concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bank of Dearborn v. Gabbert
291 S.W. 142 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1926)
Whimster v. Holmes
164 S.W. 236 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Mo. 532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/truesdail-v-sanderson-mo-1863.