Trueheart v. Eichelberger

Fourth Circuit

Trueheart v. Eichelberger

148 F.2d 634

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 16, 1944

DocketNo. 5295

StatusPublished

This text of 148 F.2d 634 (Trueheart v. Eichelberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trueheart v. Eichelberger, 148 F.2d 634 (4th Cir. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The question involved in this case is a pure question of fact and a careful consideration o'f the testimony convinces us that the able District Judge, who had the advantage of seeing and hearing all of the witnesses except the appellee, reached the correct conclusion. We would certainly not be justified in setting it aside as clearly erroneous. Rule 52, R.C.P., 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The question involved in this case is a pure question of fact and a careful consideration o'f the testimony convinces us that the able District Judge, who had the advantage of seeing and hearing all of the witnesses except the appellee, reached the correct conclusion. We would certainly not be justified in setting it aside as clearly erroneous. Rule 52, R.C.P., 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

148 F.2d 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trueheart-v-eichelberger-ca4-1944.