Trueblood v. Talkington

188 P. 159, 95 Or. 527, 1920 Ore. LEXIS 59
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 16, 1920
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 188 P. 159 (Trueblood v. Talkington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trueblood v. Talkington, 188 P. 159, 95 Or. 527, 1920 Ore. LEXIS 59 (Or. 1920).

Opinion

BEAN, J.

~We concur in the finding of the learned trial judge, that the services were reasonably worth the sum of $100, and that after deducting the reasonable value of defendant Talkington’s labor there was due plaintiff the amount decreed. It appears by a preponderance of the evidence that, owing to conditions prevailing that season, no uniform charges for threshing- per sack or bushel could safely be made; that no specific agreement was made by the parties as to price; and that the amount claimed by plaintiff was reasonable.

The trial judge heard the witnesses, and had an opportunity to observe their demeanor on the stand, [529]*529and his conclusion as to the weight of the testimony is of great importance.

The decree of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

McBride, C. J., and Johns and Bennett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reeves v. Porta
144 P.2d 493 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 P. 159, 95 Or. 527, 1920 Ore. LEXIS 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trueblood-v-talkington-or-1920.