Trueblood v. State of Florida
This text of Trueblood v. State of Florida (Trueblood v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2023-2717 _____________________________
WILMARIO D. TRUEBLOOD,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.
June 12, 2024
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Pettway v. State, 776 So. 2d 930, 931 (Fla. 2000) (holding that petitions will generally not be considered after the person has abused the judicial processes of the lower court and has been barred from filing certain actions there).
LEWIS, M.K. THOMAS, and NORDBY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Wilmario D. Trueblood, pro se, Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Trueblood v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trueblood-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2024.