Trueblood v. Nicholson
This text of 52 Ind. 420 (Trueblood v. Nicholson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an appeal to the circuit court from the action of the board of commissioners of the county, in a proceeding to change the location of a highway. ' In the circuit court the appeal was dismissed. Exception was taken, and ninety days were allowed by the court in which to file a bill of exceptions. There is a bill of exceptions in the record, but whether it was ever filed or not, or if it was filed, when, does not appear. There is no question argued that arises without a bill of exceptions. The bill of exceptions cannot be regarded as properly a part of the record, for the reason stated. Jeffries v. McNamara, 49 Ind. 142. There are many other cases to the same effect.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 Ind. 420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trueblood-v-nicholson-ind-1876.