True v. Sibley

Superior Court of New York

True v. Sibley

31 N.Y.S. 1134

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo·Decided January 7, 1895·Published

Opinion

GILDERSLEBVE, J.

The questions of fact raised by the pleadings and by the conflict of evidence in this action were properly submitted to the jury by the learned trial court in a charge to which no exception was taken. The jury, by their verdict, found in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $800. With their conclusion the general term will not interfere, as, in our opinion, it is amply justified by the evidence before us. There are no questions of law presented on this appeal which require discussion. The judgment and order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GILDERSLEBVE, J.

The questions of fact raised by the pleadings and by the conflict of evidence in this action were properly submitted to the jury by the learned trial court in a charge to which no exception was taken. The jury, by their verdict, found in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $800. With their conclusion the general term will not interfere, as, in our opinion, it is amply justified by the evidence before us. There are no questions of law presented on this appeal which require discussion. The judgment and order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

True v. Sibley, 31 N.Y.S. 1134 (superctny 1895).

Pincite

31 N.Y.S. 1134 (True v. Sibley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.