Truda v. United States

Court of Claims

Truda v. United States

75 Ct. Cl. 186, 15 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 777, 1932 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 398, 1932 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9336, 1932 WL 2140

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedMay 31, 1932

DocketNo. L-15

StatusPublished

This text of 75 Ct. Cl. 186 (Truda v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Truda v. United States, 75 Ct. Cl. 186, 15 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 777, 1932 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 398, 1932 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9336, 1932 WL 2140 (cc 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

LittletoN, Judge,

delivered the opinion:

The question in this case is whether the waiver of the statute of limitation entered into between the plaintiff and the commissioner February 23, 1926, was invalid. We have considered and decided this question in Peter L. McDonnell v. United States, No. K-488, decided this date Yante, p. 155], in which it is held that the waiver was valid and that collection was therefore timely.

For the reasons stated in the McDonnell case, this plaintiff is not entitled to recover. The petition is dismissed. It is so ordered.

Whaley, Judge; Williams, Judge; GeeeN, Judge; and Booth, Chief Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LittletoN, Judge,

delivered the opinion:

The question in this case is whether the waiver of the statute of limitation entered into between the plaintiff and the commissioner February 23, 1926, was invalid. We have considered and decided this question in Peter L. McDonnell v. United States, No. K-488, decided this date Yante, p. 155], in which it is held that the waiver was valid and that collection was therefore timely.

For the reasons stated in the McDonnell case, this plaintiff is not entitled to recover. The petition is dismissed. It is so ordered.

Whaley, Judge; Williams, Judge; GeeeN, Judge; and Booth, Chief Justice, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 Ct. Cl. 186, 15 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 777, 1932 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 398, 1932 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9336, 1932 WL 2140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/truda-v-united-states-cc-1932.