Trp Fund IV, LLC v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC

CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedMay 14, 2019
Docket77421
StatusUnpublished

This text of Trp Fund IV, LLC v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC (Trp Fund IV, LLC v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trp Fund IV, LLC v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC, (Neb. 2019).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

TRP FUND IV, LLC, A DOMESTIC No. 77421 NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, Appellant, vs. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, Respondent. EL CLER:

EY_

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is an appeal from a district court summary judgment, purportedly certified as final, in an action to quiet title. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Mark R. Denton, Judge. This court previously issued an order directing appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. It appeared that the order was not appealable as a final judgment under NRAP 3A(b)(1) because claims remained pending in the district court. See Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000) (defining a final judgment). It also appeared that the order was improperly certified as final under NRCP 54(b) because both appellant and respondent remained in the district court proceedings as certain of respondent's counterclaims against appellant remained pending in the district court. See NRCP 54(b); Loomis v. Whitehead, 124 Nev. 65, 67 n.3, 183 P.3d 890, 891 n.3 (2008) (explaining that NRCP 54(b) certification is appropriate where parties are completely removed from an action). In response to this court's order to show cause, counsel for appellant asserts that this court has jurisdiction over this appeal because

SUPREME COURT the district court entered an order "staying any and all remaining claims OF NEVADA

(C) 1947A and/or counterclaims between Appellant and Respondent pending the disposition of the instant appeal." The district court's order does not resolve the outstanding claims below. Accordingly, appellant fails to demonstrate that the district court has entered a final judgment appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(1) in the underlying case. And no other statute or court rule appears to authorize an appeal from the challenged order. See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013). This court thus concludes that it lacks jurisdiction, and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

CA.

AlAtiCsuk J. LIC11444) Stiglich Silver

cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge Hong & Hong Snell & Wilmer LLP/Salt Lake City Snell & Wilmer, LLP/Tucson Snell & Wilmer/Phoenix Snell & Wilmer, LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1907A e

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC
301 P.3d 850 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2013)
Lee v. GNLV CORP.
996 P.2d 416 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2000)
Loomis v. Whitehead
177 P.3d 1054 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Trp Fund IV, LLC v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trp-fund-iv-llc-v-nationstar-mortg-llc-nev-2019.