Troyer v. Burnup & Sims

222 So. 2d 188, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2339
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 23, 1969·No. No. 38052·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 25, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied. The petitioner’s motion for attorney’s fees is also denied.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, DREW, ADKINS and .BOYD, JJ., concur. ERVIN, C. J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Troyer v. Burnup & Sims, 222 So. 2d 188, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2339 (Fla. 1969).

222 So. 2d 188 (Troyer v. Burnup & Sims) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wainwright v. Wainwright, Inc.
237 So. 2d 154 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1970)