Troy v. Oberlander

181 A.D.2d 557, 581 N.Y.S.2d 725, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3764
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 19, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 181 A.D.2d 557 (Troy v. Oberlander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Troy v. Oberlander, 181 A.D.2d 557, 581 N.Y.S.2d 725, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Baer, Jr., J.), entered June 13, 1991, in favor of plaintiffs and against defendants-appellants in the amount of $124,898.48, inclusive of interest and disbursements, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Upon examination of the record, we agree with the Special Referee and the IAS court that plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fee request of $107,919.48 for services rendered between December 1983 and May 1990 is reasonable and supported by accurate time records and billing statements. We also agree that the tenants’ attorneys were entitled to an additional $9,700 for time expended in proving the value of their services, for a total award of $117,619.48 (Kumble v Windsor Plaza Co., 161 AD2d 259, 260, lv denied 76 NY2d 709, appeal dismissed 76 NY2d 843). Appellants’ contention that plaintiffs are not [558]*558entitled to recover for legal services related to proving the invalidity of the eviction plan that were "offensive”, rather than "defensive”, in nature, and thus not within the purview of Real Property Law § 234, was previously rejected by this court on the prior appeal herein (Troy v Oberlander, 146 AD2d 460, 461), wherein we specifically permitted "an award of attorneys’ fees to cover the reasonable costs of defending the eviction proceeding.”

We have considered the appellants’ remaining claims, and find them to be without merit. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Asch, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McIntyre v. Manhattan Ford
176 Misc. 2d 325 (New York Supreme Court, 1997)
Senfeld v. I.S.T.A. HoldIng Co.
235 A.D.2d 345 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 A.D.2d 557, 581 N.Y.S.2d 725, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/troy-v-oberlander-nyappdiv-1992.