Troy v. Lever Bros.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Troy v. Lever Bros.

13 A.D.2d 463, 214 N.Y.S.2d 246, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12087

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 14, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 463 (Troy v. Lever Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Troy v. Lever Bros., 13 A.D.2d 463, 214 N.Y.S.2d 246, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12087 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered on April 29, 1960, granting, in

part, defendant’s motion to quash, vacate and/or modify the subpoena duces tecum, dated April 21, 1960, served upon defendant, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Appeal from order entered on May 26, 1960, granting, in part, defendant’s motion to quash, vacate and/or modify a notice to produce dated April 21, 1960, served upon the attorneys for the defendant, unanimously dismissed, without costs, solely on the ground that there is involved merely a trial court ruling which may be reviewed only on appeal from the final judgment. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered on April 29, 1960, granting, in

part, defendant’s motion to quash, vacate and/or modify the subpoena duces tecum, dated April 21, 1960, served upon defendant, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Appeal from order entered on May 26, 1960, granting, in part, defendant’s motion to quash, vacate and/or modify a notice to produce dated April 21, 1960, served upon the attorneys for the defendant, unanimously dismissed, without costs, solely on the ground that there is involved merely a trial court ruling which may be reviewed only on appeal from the final judgment. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 463, 214 N.Y.S.2d 246, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/troy-v-lever-bros-nyappdiv-1961.