TROY RANDLE STALTER v. STATE OF FLORIDA

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 21, 2023
Docket23-2601
StatusPublished

This text of TROY RANDLE STALTER v. STATE OF FLORIDA (TROY RANDLE STALTER v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
TROY RANDLE STALTER v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

Case No. 5D23-2601 LT Case No. 2021-CF-000322 2021-CF-000321 _____________________________

TROY RANDLE STALTER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County. Daniel B. Merritt, Jr., Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Darnelle Paige Lawshe, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Stephen R. Putnam, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

December 21, 2023

PER CURIAM. In this Anders 1 appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence imposed by the trial court but remand for the trial court to correct the written judgment in 2021-CF-000322 to reflect that Appellant was convicted in count 2 for trafficking in morphine under section 893.135(1)(c), Florida Statutes; count 4 for trafficking in oxycodone under section 893.135(1)(c), Florida Statutes; count 6 for trafficking in LSD under section 893.135(1)(l), Florida Statutes; and count 8 for trafficking in MDMA under section 893.135(1)(k), Florida Statutes. See Davis v. State, 211 So. 3d 354, 354 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) (“We remand only for correction of a scrivener’s error in judgment” in an Anders case.).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s errors.

MAKAR, BOATRIGHT, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Davis v. State
211 So. 3d 354 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
TROY RANDLE STALTER v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/troy-randle-stalter-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2023.