Troy Lee Harms v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 14, 2002
Docket07-01-00492-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Troy Lee Harms v. State (Troy Lee Harms v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Troy Lee Harms v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

TROY LEE HARMS V STATE OF TEXAS
NO. 07-01-0492-CR


IN THE COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


AT AMARILLO


PANEL D


FEBRUARY 14, 2002

______________________________


TROY LEE HARMS
,



Appellant

v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS,


Appellee
_________________________________


FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;


NO. 34,541-E; HON. ABE LOPEZ, PRESIDING
_______________________________


ABATEMENT AND REMAND
_______________________________


Before BOYD, C.J., QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.

Appellant, Troy Lee Harms, appeals from a judgment revoking his community supervision, adjudicating his guilt, and sentencing him to prison for fifteen years. Sentence was pronounced in open court on November 15, 2001. Thus, the appellate record was due by January 14, 2002. Tex. R. App. P. 35.2(a). Though the reporter's record has been received, the clerk's record has not. Furthermore, according to the court clerk, the record has not been developed because: 1) she has not received an order from the trial court to develop same; 2) she has not received payment nor an affidavit of inability to pay from appellant; and 3) appellant has not made arrangements to pay for same.

Accordingly, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 108th District Court of Potter County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine the following:

1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;

2. whether appellant is indigent;

3. whether counsel has been appointed to prosecute this appeal;

4. if counsel has not been appointed, whether appellant is entitled to appointed counsel; and

5. whether the appellant is entitled to the preparation of a free clerk's record.

The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. Furthermore, the trial court shall execute findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the aforementioned issues and disclosing the name, address, state bar number, and telephone and fax numbers of counsel appointed, if any. The district court shall also cause to be developed 1) a supplemental clerk's record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law and all orders of the district court issued as a result of its hearing on this matter, and 2) a reporter's record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the aforementioned hearing. Additionally, the district court shall cause the supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before March 18, 2002. Should

further time be needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before March 14, 2002.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

d to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before January 5, 2007. Should additional time be needed to perform these tasks, the trial court may request same on or before January 5, 2007.

1. John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment. Tex. Gov't Code Ann. §75.002(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2006).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 75.002
Texas GV § 75.002(a)(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Troy Lee Harms v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/troy-lee-harms-v-state-texapp-2002.