Troy Hills Village v. Fischler
This text of 301 A.2d 153 (Troy Hills Village v. Fischler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TROY HILLS VILLAGE, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
BRUCE FISCHLER AND BETH FISCHLER, HIS WIFE, AND GEORGE F. KUGLER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges FRITZ, LYNCH and JOELSON.
Mr. Lester P. Dubow argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Ralph Labendz, on the brief; Messrs. Krugman, Chapnick, Grimshaw & Dubow, attorneys).
Mr. Ivan V. White, Jr. argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Mandon & White, attorneys).
Messrs. Michael D. Lang and Richard E. Blumberg filed a brief amicus curiae on behalf of The New Jersey Tenants Organization.
PER CURIAM.
The sole issue before us is the constitutionality of L. 1970, c. 210 (N.J.S.A. 2A:42-10.10 et seq.). The court below found the law constitutional and we agree, substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Collins' written opinion, 122 N.J. Super. 572 (Law Div. 1971).
The matter reached us prematurely, a counterclaim not yet having been decided. We were advised at oral argument that defendant-tenants have moved; the counterclaim may be moot. In any event, we remand for disposition of the counterclaim.
Judgment denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and dismissing complaint is affirmed. Counterclaim is remanded for disposition. We do not retain jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
301 A.2d 153, 122 N.J. Super. 525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/troy-hills-village-v-fischler-njsuperctappdiv-1973.