Troy E. Hollins v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 19, 2023
Docket01-22-00776-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Troy E. Hollins v. the State of Texas (Troy E. Hollins v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Troy E. Hollins v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Appellate case name: Troy E. Hollins v. The State of Texas Appellate case number: 01-22-00776-CR Trial court case number: CR2018-434 and CR2020-054 Trial court: 207th District Court of Comal County A jury convicted appellant, Troy E. Hollins, on two counts of the offense of engaging in organized criminal activity, and the trial court assessed his punishment at confinement for eighty years. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on September 1, 2022. Appellant’s counsel, Paul Morgan, has filed two motions with the Court, including a Motion to Withdraw and Motion to Abate and Remand. According to the motions, a “conflict recently arose between Appellant and undersigned counsel.” The motions further state that the “trial court held a hearing on January 4, 2022 to determine if undersigned counsel may be permitted to withdraw as appellate counsel and whether Appellant qualifies for appointed appellate counsel.” However, because the appellate record has been filed with this Court, the “trial court is unable to appoint . . . counsel to represent Appellant on appeal because the trial court currently lacks jurisdiction to do so.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(g). Accordingly, counsel requests that this Court abate the appeal and remand to the trial court to determine: (1) whether Appellant wishes to continue prosecuting his appeal; (2) whether to grant counsel’s motion to withdraw; and (3) whether Appellant is entitled to appointment of new counsel. Accordingly, we grant appellant’s Motion to Abate and Remand, and abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court to determine whether counsel, Paul Morgan, should be allowed to withdraw from representing appellant on appeal. If counsel is allowed to withdraw, the trial court is further directed to determine whether Appellant is entitled to have counsel appointed, at no expense to appellant, to represent him on appeal. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 1.051(a), (c), (d)(1); 26.04(a), (b)(1), (p). The trial court is directed to make its determinations, and enter any orders, or findings and recommendations it deems necessary, within fourteen days of the date of this order. The trial court clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s orders, and any findings or recommendations, with this Court no later than thirty days from the date of this order. The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket. The Court will consider counsel’s Motion to Withdraw after the supplemental clerk’s record is filed containing the trial court’s orders, findings and/or conclusions, and the case is reinstated on the Court’s active docket. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Amparo Guerra________  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __January 19, 2023_____

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Troy E. Hollins v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/troy-e-hollins-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.