Troy Davis v. Willis Provost

• Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
• Decided: February 13, 2008
• Docket: CA-0007-1519
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

07-1519

TROY AND CYNTHIA DAVIS

VERSUS

WILLIS PROVOST, ET AL.

************

APPEAL FROM THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF IBERIA, NO. 106638-E HONORABLE KEITH R.J. COMEAUX, DISTRICT JUDGE

PER CURIAM

Court composed of John D. Saunders, Michael G. Sullivan, and James T. Genovese, Judges.

MOTION TO DISMISS THE APPEAL DENIED.

Edmond Dwayne Jordan Attorney at Law Post Office Box 490 Brusly, LA 70718 (225) 749-4400 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS/APPELLANTS: Troy Davis and Cynthia Davis Kristi D. Husher Attorney at Law 1405 West Pinhook Road, Suite 105 Lafayette, LA 70503 (337) 234-0099 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS/APPELLEES: Paul Willis Provost, Sr. Mary Linda Zenon Provost Gerald James Sonnier PER CURIAM.

The defendant-appellee, Gerald Sonnier, moves to dismiss the appeal of the

plaintiffs-appellants, Troy and Cynthia Davis, based on the appeal not having been

timely perfected and the failure of plaintiffs-appellants to timely pay costs. For the

reasons set forth below, we deny the motion.

On May 14, 2007, appellants filed a motion for suspensive appeal. The trial

court signed the order granting a suspensive appeal on May 22, 2007. However, the

judgment was not signed by the trial court until June 5, 2007.

Appellants paid costs on October 9, 2007. On October 9, 2007, the trial court

ordered appellants to file an order for suspensive appeal and a security bond in the

amount of $18,000.00 within five days. Appellants posted the bond on October 29,

2007, and appellants filed the order for suspensive appeal on October 30, 2007. The

record in this case was lodged on November 30, 2007. Appellee filed the motion to

dismiss the appeal on January 23, 2008.

Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 1911 provides, in pertinent part,

that: “Except as otherwise provided by law, every final judgment shall be signed by

the judge. For the purpose of an appeal as provided in Article 2038, no appeal may

be taken from a final judgment until the requirement of this Article has been

fulfilled.” Therefore, a motion for appeal filed prior to the entering of judgment is

premature and subject to dismissal until the final judgment is signed. However, that

prematurity is cured by the signing of the judgment. See Overmier v. Traylor, 475

So.2d 1094 (La.1985).

Appellee first contends that appellants failed to timely perfect the instant

appeal. Here, although appellants filed their motion for appeal before the final

judgment was signed, a final judgment was entered prior to the lodging of the appeal

in this court. Thus, the prematurity of the motion for appeal was cured on June 5,

1 2007, when the final judgment was signed. Therefore, the instant appeal was timely

perfected.

In addition, appellee argues that the appeal should be dismissed for failure to

timely pay costs and file the suspensive appeal bond. The costs were paid, and the

appeal bond was filed prior to the lodging of the appeal. A motion to dismiss an

appeal for failure to timely file the suspensive appeal bond must be filed no later than

three days from the lodging of the record in the appellate court or the return date,

whichever is later. La.Code Civ.P. art. 2161; Strother v. Continental Cas. Co., 05-

1094 (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/8/06), 923 So.2d 783. The appeal was lodged on November

30, 2007; however, appellee did not file his motion to dismiss until January 23, 2007.

Thus, appellee’s motion to dismiss on this ground was not timely filed.

Accordingly, for these reasons, we deny the motion to dismiss the appeal.

This opinion is NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. Rules 2-16.2 and 2-16.3, Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal.