Troy Crownover v. PAA Consulting, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 19, 2020
Docket13-20-00397-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Troy Crownover v. PAA Consulting, LLC (Troy Crownover v. PAA Consulting, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Troy Crownover v. PAA Consulting, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-20-00397-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

TROY CROWNOVER, Appellant,

v.

PAA CONSULTING, LLC, Appellee.

On appeal from the 117th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes Order Per Curiam

This matter is before the Court on its own motion. The record before the Court fails

to illustrate that all claims asserted by or against all parties have been

disposed. Appellant attempts to appeal an order entered on August 10, 2020, in which

the trial court ordered partial final summary judgment and proports to sever all causes of

action between Plaintiff Troy Crownover and Defendant PAA Consulting Inc. The order, however, fails to provide a new cause number for the severed party.

The record reflects litigation with other parties still pending under the original trial

court cause number; furthermore, there is a line in the order where the new cause

number, if any, would be written. Under these circumstances, a court of appeals

may abate a cause in order to permit clarification by the trial court. Lehmann v. Har-Con

Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191 at 206 (stating the appellate court may allow an appealed order

that is not final to be modified so as to be made final and may allow the modified order

and all proceedings relating to it to be included in a supplemental record); see Tex. R.

App. P. 27.2, 44.3.

Accordingly, we ABATE the appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court for

clarification. Upon remand, the trial court shall address the following:

1. Whether the trial court intended the judgment to be severed, and the new cause number;

2. Whether the trial court intended to completely dispose of all claims and all parties.

The trial court shall cause its findings and recommendations, together with any

orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental

clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter's record of

any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental

reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the

expiration of thirty days from the date of this order. This appeal will be reinstated upon

receipt of the foregoing materials and upon further order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 19th day of November, 2020.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Troy Crownover v. PAA Consulting, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/troy-crownover-v-paa-consulting-llc-texapp-2020.