Troy Allen Dennis v. the State of Texas
This text of Troy Allen Dennis v. the State of Texas (Troy Allen Dennis v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-22-00488-CR
Troy Allen Dennis, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. CR2018-048, THE HONORABLE STEPHANIE BASCON, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Troy Allen Dennis was convicted by a jury of aggravated sexual assault
of a child younger than six years of age and sentenced to life imprisonment. See Tex. Penal
Code § 22.021(a)(1)(B)(i), (f)(1).
Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by
a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the
requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record
demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967);
Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio,
488 U.S. 75, 81–82 (1988). Appellant’s counsel has certified to this Court that she sent copies of
the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record
and file a pro se response, and provided a motion to assist appellant in obtaining the record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also Anders, 386 U.S. at
744. Appellant filed a pro se response on July 27, 2023.
We have conducted an independent review of the record—including the record of
the trial and sentencing proceedings below, appellate counsel’s brief, and appellant’s pro se
response—and find no reversible error. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at
766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel
that the record presents no arguably meritorious grounds for review, and the appeal is frivolous.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. The trial court’s judgment of
conviction is affirmed.
__________________________________________ Rosa Lopez Theofanis, Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Theofanis
Affirmed
Filed: August 25, 2023
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Troy Allen Dennis v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/troy-allen-dennis-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.